Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all make sure regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
In case the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according towards the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made distinct that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is established as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct will not be satisfactory however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful way. Read more
Even though there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there is no precedent while in the home state, relevant case law from another state can be regarded as because of the court.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load presented to any reported judgment may well depend on the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[7]
Because of this, simply just citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in such-and-these types of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving around the community wanting to find their phone is likely to get more frustrating than it’s value.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is get more info subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision of the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Undertaking a case legislation search can be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, together with:
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
eight. To the reasons stated over, this court finds the petition to generally be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, also are dismissed. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance into the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.